Which is more appropriate when referring to someone with a disability?

Which is more appropriate when referring to someone with a disability? Options: (a) A stroke victim (b) A person who has had a stroke (c) None of the above (d) All of these ✅ Correct Option: (b) A person who has had a stroke Explanation (200+ words): The most appropriate way to refer to someone with a disability is by using person-first language, such as “a person who has had a stroke.” This approach emphasizes the individual first, rather than defining them by a condition or disability. Modern academic, educational, and ethical writing standards strongly recommend avoiding labels that equate a person entirely with their disability. Terms like “stroke victim” can imply helplessness, suffering, or lack of agency, which may unintentionally reinforce stereotypes or stigma. Person-first language promotes dignity, respect, and inclusivity by recognizing that a disability is only one aspect of a person’s life, not their identity. In research reports, especially in education and social sciences, language choice reflects professional ethics and sensitivity. The American Psychological Association (APA) and similar bodies emphasize respectful terminology. Using person-first language aligns with human rights perspectives and inclusive education principles. Therefore, option (b) is correct because it maintains neutrality, avoids labeling, and respects the individuality of the person. This practice is especially important in educational research, where language can influence attitudes, policies, and professional conduct. 10 PPSC-Related Facts: 1. Person-first language is ethically preferred 2. Avoid labeling individuals by disability 3. APA recommends respectful terminology 4. Language influences social attitudes 5. Research writing must be inclusive 6. Disabilities do not define identity 7. Respectful language reduces stigma 8. Educational research promotes equity 9. Ethical writing reflects professionalism 10. Inclusive terms improve credibility