Teachers who want to assess each student's mastery of objectives of weeklong lessons should use:
Teachers who want to assess each student's mastery of objectives of weeklong lessons should use:
Options:
(a) performance-referenced grading
(b) planned-formative grading
(c) balanced-scoring grading
(d) criterion-referenced grading
✅ Correct Option: (d) criterion-referenced grading
Explanation (200+ words):
Criterion-referenced grading evaluates students based on predefined learning objectives, not in comparison with other students. When teachers aim to assess mastery of weeklong lesson objectives, criterion-referenced grading is the most appropriate approach because it directly measures whether students have achieved specific instructional goals. Unlike norm-referenced grading, which ranks students, criterion-referenced grading focuses on individual learning outcomes. This system aligns perfectly with mastery learning theory, ensuring that all students are evaluated against the same standards. In weekly lesson assessments, teachers want to know whether students understand the content—not how they compare with peers. This approach supports fairness, clarity, and transparency. Students know what is expected, and teachers can identify learning gaps early. It is widely used in outcome-based education and recommended in modern assessment practices. PPSC frequently emphasizes this grading system due to its strong alignment with instructional objectives and accountability standards.
10 Related Facts:
Criterion-referenced grading measures mastery. It does not involve ranking students. Learning objectives are defined beforehand. Supports formative assessment. Encourages mastery learning. Reduces unhealthy competition. Used in competency-based education. Helps identify individual weaknesses. Promotes instructional alignment. Frequently tested in PPSC exams.