How many primary schools did not have textbooks for children in both sectors and areas according to NEC 2006?

How many primary schools did not have textbooks for children in both sectors and areas according to NEC 2006? (a) 14% (b) 24% (c) 18% (d) 28% ✅ Correct option: (c) 18% Explanation (200+ words) The NEC report 2006 revealed that 18% of primary schools, across both public and private sectors and in both urban and rural areas, did not have textbooks available for students. This shortage was a major barrier to effective learning at the primary level. Textbooks are the most basic instructional resource, especially in Pakistan where teaching is largely textbook-based. Lack of textbooks negatively affects reading skills, comprehension, and overall academic performance. The problem was more severe in rural and public sector schools due to delays in distribution, funding constraints, and weak monitoring mechanisms. NEC findings prompted education planners to emphasize timely textbook provision and reforms in textbook boards. For PPSC, such questions test understanding of educational inputs and infrastructure, not just enrollment statistics. 10 PPSC-Relevant Facts 1. Textbooks essential learning tools 2. NEC exposed resource gaps 3. Primary level most affected 4. Rural schools face shortages 5. Public sector delays common 6. Textbook Boards responsible 7. Lack affects literacy outcomes 8. Monitoring mechanisms weak 9. Policy reforms introduced later 10. Input-based MCQs frequent