Difference Between Teaching Strategy and Teaching Method


Distinguishing Strategy from Method

In the world of pedagogy, the terms 'teaching strategy' and 'teaching method' are often used interchangeably, yet they represent distinct concepts. For students preparing for PPSC, FPSC, or teaching degree exams, understanding this difference is essential for answering pedagogical theory questions accurately. While both are used to facilitate learning, they differ in their scope, origin, and application.

One fundamental difference lies in their theoretical foundations. Teaching methods are often rooted in classical organizational theory, being 'task-centered' and focused on the presentation of content. In contrast, teaching strategies are based on modern organizational theory, which is both 'task and relationship-centered,' focusing on the interaction between teacher, student, and learning objectives.

Key Differences in Implementation

The elements that define these two concepts are also distinct. Teaching methods focus on the mode of presentation, and the matter being taught usually determines the method (telling, showing, or doing). Conversely, teaching strategies are determined by behavioral objectives—cognitive, affective, and psychomotor—and the specific conditions of learning.

Adding to the above, the origins of these terms differ. The term 'strategy' has been borrowed from military science, implying a high-level, calculated approach to achieving a victory (or in this case, learning). 'Method,' however, is a traditional term rooted in pedagogy. On top of that, while teaching strategies are implemented through 'tactics,' teaching methods are implemented through 'techniques.' This hierarchical difference is crucial for educators to understand when planning their lessons.

Approaching Teaching: Micro vs. Macro

Another significant point of difference is the scale of the approach. Teaching strategies employ a 'micro-approach,' looking at specific instructional behaviors that can be measured and adjusted. Teaching methods, on the other hand, use a 'macro-approach' to instruction, viewing the presentation as a whole style.

Finally, the evaluation criteria for these two differ. The effectiveness of a teaching strategy is typically evaluated by administering a criterion test to see if the specific objectives were met. Methods are generally evaluated based on the student's overall mastery of the subject matter. By grasping these nuanced differences, teachers in Pakistan can better plan their lessons, choosing the right strategies and methods to suit the needs of their students, whether they are in a classroom or preparing for competitive examinations.

Authoritative References

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference between a strategy and a method?

A strategy is a broad, goal-oriented plan based on modern theory, while a method is a formal style of content presentation based on traditional pedagogical theory.

What does it mean that strategies are 'task and relationship-centered'?

It means strategies focus not just on the content but also on the interaction and relationship between the teacher and the learner to achieve objectives.

How are strategies and methods evaluated differently?

Strategies are evaluated by checking if specific behavioral objectives were achieved, whereas methods are evaluated based on the student's overall subject mastery.

Which one uses tactics and which uses techniques?

Teaching strategies are implemented by tactics, while teaching methods are implemented by techniques.